Arches_Thynn v Ogle (dragged)

Document excerpt

12 Item Interrogetur Quilet whether doe you know or have heard that the Lady Ogle by such words & discourses in the next preceding Interrogatory mentioned, was put in feare that she should be stolen away & thereupon she was frighted from riding abroad, in which she much delighted and and formerly used very often, especially after her last comeing to Sion, the same being in or about the months of March or April 1681 and alsoe from walking in Sion feilds, and from going into the wildennesse there where she used to reueate herselfe, declare the truth herein Et fiat ut supra, 13 Item Interrogetur Quilet whether doe you not know or have heard, that the said Lady Ogle was further told by the said Countesse of Northumberland, Captaine Brett, and Ladye Catherine his wife or some of them that some persons were gott over the wall in the garden of Sion house in [th]e night with intent to Steale her away Et fiat ut supra, 14 Item Interrogetur Quilet whether before the said pretended Contract and marriage, alleadged in this Cause did not the Countesse of Northumberland use some discourse, and pretend that there was some danger of the Lady Ogle her going abroad, and that the said Countesse was then asked by some person or persons, why she and the Lady Ogle did not goe downe to Sawney Petworth where there was Convenient riding and with safety for the said Lady Ogle without any danger of Surprise and whether was not the said Lady Ogle witting therevnto, and sayd she alwaies liked Petworth well, and desired to goe thither, and whither thereupon did not the said Countesse fall into a very great passion and was very much offended with the said Lady Ogle, and would not suffer her to speake any more of going on to goe to Petworth and that she was not at Petworth that Summer, Declare the truth herein Et fiat ut supra; 15 Item In Case any witnesse being examined upon the first article of the allegation given in this Cause on the behalfe of the said Mr Thynne shall depose to the Contents thereof, Interrogetur, who by Name were the persons by whome it was discoursed, considered, and Concluded as in the said article is Contained, and where, and in what house and place was such supposed discourse and Consideration and Conclusion had and made, Et fiat ut supra; 16 Item Interrogetur Quilet whether doe you not know or have heard that the said Thomas Thyn Esquire had, not, nor hath any other estate, in the Lands by him possessed and enjoyed then during his life only and in that Estate which he hath or doth pretend to have, he is only a Tenant for life and that he was and is indebted to severall persons in sevull great summes and to what sum[m]e, as you know, beleeve, or have heard, Et fiat ut supra, 17 Item In Case any witnesse being Examined upon the Second arte of the said allegacion shall depose to the Contents thereof Interrogetur, whether before the pretended treaty of marriage and the supposed delivery of the particulars of Mr Thynnes estate therein mentioned, had not the said Countesse of Northumberland and the said Captaine Brett and the Lady Catherine his wife & some others, of the witnesses, who are pretended to be present at the supposed Contract & marriage alleadged in this Cause, or some of them, had some Conference how to bring about a marriage between the said Mr Thynne and the Lady Ogle and in order therevnto did designe that the place where the said Mr Thynne should be introduced to the said Lady should be at the said Captaine Brett's house, and that that should be the place where they would bring her to him and where he should have accesse to her, Et fiat ut supra, 18 Item Interrogetur Quilet whether before the said pretended Contract & marriage in this Cause