Manuscript Abbreviations and Ligatures: A Reader's Guide to Scribal Shorthand
…common marks in English, Latin and Middle Dutch records, and when to preserve or expand them.
Leo Team
July 15, 2026

Contents
Manuscript abbreviations are the suspensions, contractions, brevigraphs, raised letters and ligatures that scribes used for a thousand years to write faster on expensive parchment and paper. This guide sets out the five classes to learn, how to tell a suspension from a contraction, the high-frequency marks that carry most of the weight in English, Latin and Middle Dutch records, and the editorial choice every transcriber faces: whether to preserve an abbreviation or expand it.
Manuscript abbreviations are not random shorthand. They form a rule-governed system, inherited from Roman practice and refined across a thousand years of scribal work, and once you know the categories they fall into, most of them resolve on sight. There are five classes to learn — suspension, contraction, brevigraph, superscript, and ligature — plus a handful of high-frequency marks that account for the bulk of what you will meet on a page. Learn those first, and the rest becomes a reference-lookup problem rather than a wall. For English records, the free Leo Academy Handbook is that reference: nearly two hundred abbreviations, each with its reading and where you will meet it.
This guide sits alongside our broader work on reading old handwriting and paleography, and assumes you can already make out the letterforms — the problem here is what to do when the letters aren't all there.
Why scribes abbreviated at all
Parchment was expensive, ink was slow, and hands cramped. Abbreviation saved all three. But it was never improvised. The system descends in a direct line from Tironian notes — the shorthand devised around 63 BC by Marcus Tullius Tiro, Cicero's freedman and secretary, which began with about 4,000 signs and was expanded in the medieval monasteries to about 13,000. Christian scribes layered their own conventions on top: the nomina sacra, contractions of holy names marked with an overline, of which around fifteen forms are attested in Greek New Testament manuscripts by the fourth century.
The practical consequence: abbreviation is conventional, so it is learnable. A scribe writing a will in 1590 and a notary drawing a contract in 1720 drew on the same repertoire, with local accents. Abbreviation persisted in notarial, ecclesiastical, and bureaucratic writing well into the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and German Kurrent chancery documents carried it into the early twentieth.
The five classes
Every mark you meet belongs to one of five structural types. This typology is standard across the modern handbooks — Cappelli, Clemens and Graham, and Honkapohja's survey for VARIENG all use it.
Suspension
A word cut short at the end, with the missing letters supplied by context. English Tho: for Thomas, gent. for gentleman; Latin fil. for filius; Latin and Spanish q̃ for que. The signal is usually a colon, a point or a flourish after the first letters. The reader restores the ending. In administrative records it is everywhere.
Contraction
Letters omitted from the interior of a word, usually with the first and last letters retained and a mark signalling the gap. Latin dn̄s for dominus. English Dr for doctor, and pd for p[oun]d. Contraction is the class that most often misleads a modern eye, because the surviving letters can look like a complete, if strange, word — and because the same letters can stand for different words: pᵈ is pound after a sum of money and paid on a receipt, so the line decides.
Suspension or contraction? The quick test
Look at the end of the word. If its last letter is there (Dr, dn̄s, pd), it is a contraction, and the missing letters are inside. If the word simply stops (Tho:, gent.), it is a suspension, and the missing letters are at the end. It tells you where the letters you supply belong — and why a suspension can be ambiguous: Lo: can be Lord or Lordship.
Brevigraph
A single sign standing for a letter, a syllable, or a whole word. These most reward memorisation, because they cannot be worked out from the letters around them. The core set, as the Handbook gives them:
- The p-forms. A p with a bar through the descender, ꝑ, is per or par (ꝑishe = parish, ꝑsone = person). A p with a loop back through the descender, ꝓ, is pro (ꝓfitt = profit). A p with a hook or bar above, pͤ, is pre or pri (pͤsent = present). Scribes often used ꝑ and ꝓ for each other, so let the word decide. Pervasive in legal and notarial records in every language.
- The two 9-shapes. A raised 9, ꝰ, is -us, mostly in Latin (eiꝰ = eius). A 9 on the line, ꝯ, is con or com (ꝯtent = content). Position tells them apart.
- ꝭ, a looped stroke after the last letter, for -es, -is or -ys (goodꝭ = goodes)
- The er hook, a hook or zigzag above a letter, for er or re (eu͛ = euer, neu͛ = neuer)
- ꝝ for the Latin genitive plural -rum (dominorum). Take care: the sign began as a general mark that a word was cut short, and reading it always as -rum is what produced false names such as Sarum.
- The Tironian et (⁊) and the ampersand (&) for and or Latin et, and &c. for et cetera. The Latin -que is a q with a mark (q; or q̃).
- Xp̄ for Christ-, from the Greek chi-rho: Xpofer = Christopher, Xpian = Christian
Superscript letter
A small raised letter, usually the last letter or letters of the word, with the middle left out. The English wᶜʰ (which), wᵗʰ (with), yoʳ (your), Mʳ (Master) and sᵈ (said) work this way. A raised r at the end of a word stands for a vowel plus r, usually -er (lettʳ, daughtʳ). In German the same principle produces raised-letter contractions throughout Kanzlei writing.
In yᵉ for the and the abbreviation yᵗ for that, the y is not a y at all but a survival of the old letter thorn (þ). Read th: the, that, never "ye". Transcribers usually keep yᵗ as written rather than spelling it out. And some raised letters save nothing: youʳ is simply your and theᵐ is them, with every letter present.
Ligature
Two or more letters joined in one pen-stroke: æ, œ, ct, st, fi, ff, fl. Most ligatures are calligraphic — a matter of speed, not abbreviation — and carry no omitted material: a ct ligature (mostly an italic and mixed-hand join) is simply ct written elegantly. One English join is a letter in its own right: ff at the start of a word is a capital F (ffrancis), and editions keep it as written.
The marks that carry the most weight
If you learn nothing else, learn these, because they recur across languages and centuries.
The macron (or titulus). A bar over a letter — straight or wavy — signals an omitted m or n. Comūne for commune, English cōmon and frō for common and from, and -cōn for -cion; German genom̄en for genommen, where the Nasalstrich stands for the missing nasal. This one mark resolves a large share of contractions in every Latin-alphabet tradition. Two cautions. The bar is also a general sign that something is missing (dn̄s, gen̄t). And some bars are flourishes that abbreviate nothing (accordingē): if the word is complete without the mark, read it as written.
The long s (ſ). Not a diacritic and not a mistake, but a normal letterform used medially and initially from antiquity to about 1800 in English, and later still in German Fraktur — in the hand, made like an f without its tick. It is a genuine s. Its resemblance to f is the single most common misreading a modern eye — and, as we will see, a machine — makes on early-modern material.
How the same system looks across languages
The repertoire is Latin-derived and shared, but each tradition inflects it. This is where a general handbook stops being enough and a language-specific tutorial earns its place.
English secretary hand (16th–18th c.) leans on thorn-based forms — yᵉ (the), yᵗ (that) — alongside raised-letter forms such as wᶜʰ, wᵗʰ and yoʳ, the -es sign ꝭ, the er hook, and the p-forms in legal instruments; the -us sign belongs mainly to the Latin passages. Our guide on how to read secretary hand covers the letterforms around them, the Folger Shakespeare Library's alphabet book is a good visual primer, and Leo Academy's free English secretary hand course drills the raised letters and signs lesson by lesson.
English records: the everyday abbreviations
Registers, wills and accounts repeat a short list. Forenames are cut short with a colon, a raised last letter or both: Tho:, Wᵐ, Eliz:, Robᵗ. Titles and status words: Mʳ, Mʳˢ, gent., Esqʳ. Money: li. s. d. for pounds, shillings and pence, which a transcription leaves as written. Inventories and wills: Itᵐ (Item, "also"), Impʳ (Imprimis, "first"), &c., viz (videlicet, "namely"). Legal records: sᵈ (said), foresᵈ, pl or plt (plaintiff).
Latin inside English records
English registers and court records switch into Latin: Dñi (Domini) and Aᵒ Dñi (Anno Domini) in dates; bapt., sepult. and nupt. for baptised, buried and married; ux. (uxor, wife) and fil. (filius, son); ꝑochia for parochia, parish. Our glossary of Latin genealogy terms gives the full vocabulary for registers. In the courts, q̄ or quer̄ (querens, plaintiff), ex ꝑte (ex parte) and dn̄s recur; reading old court records covers those documents.
French notarial and chancery hands standardised abbreviations for que, par, per, pour, avec, dict, and titles, together with the 9-shaped brevigraphs. The Newberry Library's French paleography resource catalogues the frequent forms; Prou's Manuel de paléographie latine et française (1924) remains the reference grammar.
Spanish escribano records (16th–18th c.) are usually taught in six categories — contracciones, sobreposiciones, suspensiones, siglas, convencionalismos, and entretejido. Watch for q̃ (que), p̃ or p̄ (per/por), ñ (en), and x̃ (Christo). Kasten and Needham's Syllables, Signs, Letters (2011) is the modern handbook.
German Kurrent and Kanzlei (14th–20th c.) run a heavy contraction system: er- and re- contractions, the Nasalstrich over vowels, and terminal abbreviations, documented at Ad fontes.
Middle Dutch abbreviation patterns
Middle Dutch scribes took their signs from the Latin system but used them more sparingly, and an expansion has to follow the copyist's own spelling and dialect. Radboud University's course Transcriberen van Middelnederlandse teksten (Kienhorst and Kors) groups the patterns you will meet:
- The bar. Over a vowel it means an omitted n or m; over the n it is the standing abbreviation of ende ("and"). It is also a general mark of omission, as in co with a bar for coninc.
- Points around a short form. Sigla are often set between points: .co. for coninc, .R. for ridder.
- A raised apostrophe for an omitted r with its vowel, usually er or re: d' for daer, h'a for hare, s' for sinte
- A struck letter. A v or w with a stroke through it stands for ver or wer; the p-forms keep their Latin values, and ꝑ can also be paer.
- Raised letters. A raised vowel marks an omitted r before or after it; a raised t stands for -heit or niet.
- Conventional signs. A 3-shaped sign stands for et, and by vowel change for -at, -iet or -eit (dat, wat, niet, -heit); the 9-sign is con/com on the line and -us when raised (aldus), and also -as or -oes in was and altoes.
- Money: lb and d for pont and penninc, as in Latin
Editions differ in how they show the result. Leiden's Middle Dutch paleography module, for example, expands abbreviations in italic but leaves voirs. (voirscreven, "aforesaid") and sums of money as written.
Italian likewise takes the Latin system with local idiosyncrasies; Cappelli's Lexicon Abbreviaturarum remains indispensable, and is freely searchable online through Ad fontes.
One honest complication for vernacular work: the line between a deliberate abbreviation and a variant spelling is fuzzy. A shortened form in a Dutch register may be a true suspension or simply how the writer spelled the word. Judgement, not lookup, settles these.
To expand or to preserve
Here is the decision that outlasts every reading question. When you transcribe an abbreviated word, do you write what is on the page — the q̃, the macron, the 9-sign — or do you silently expand it to que, commune, -us?
The answer depends on what the transcription is for, and it must be declared and consistent. Silent expansion is inappropriate for source-preserving work, because abbreviation practice is itself evidence: it dates documents, localises them and identifies scribal hands. Legal records and charters conventionally preserve every suspension mark; vernacular parish registers are sometimes expanded but should retain names as written.
Printed editions of English documents agree that abbreviations are written out, but not on how: some do it silently, keeping Mʳ and &, while others print the letters they supply in italic so you can see what was on the page. Square brackets mean supplied letters in one edition and deleted words in another, so read an edition's key before you trust its brackets. Our guide to transcription conventions for old documents sets out how to write that key.
The scholarly middle path is TEI's <choice> mechanism, which lets you encode both the abbreviated form and its expansion — <abbr> for what the scribe wrote, <expan> for your reading — so both the diplomatic and the readable text survive in one file. For the character set itself, the MUFI recommendation maps the brevigraphs, long s, and combining marks to Unicode code points, so a ꝝ stays a ꝝ rather than degrading to plain text.
Where machine transcription helps — and where it silently doesn't
At scale — a notarial series, a run of parish registers — the question becomes what a machine does with these marks. Leo's ATR-1 model was built for exactly this problem, and the abbreviation is where the difference shows.
A model built to preserve the marks
ATR-1 is specially tuned for historical documents in the Latin alphabet — handwritten and printed, in whatever language the alphabet records — and it works out of the box, with no per-corpus model to train. It is trained to transcribe what is on the page, and it does not over-correct or silently modernise: the long s stays a long s, the macron is not silently resolved, yᵗ stays yᵗ, and archaic spelling, strikethroughs and marginal additions survive. It reads the image at high resolution, where general models scale it down, so a small raised letter or a bar is still there to weigh. Output that looks wrong is caught by built-in failure detection — hidden, retried, and refunded if the job cannot succeed — and the errors that do get through are the recoverable kind: a wrong letter you check against the image beside the text, not a fluent invention. Corrections feed back into training.
Where you want an expansion or a modernisation, that is a separate, explicit Transformation that writes to a new tab and leaves the faithful base reading untouched, so the editorial act is recorded, not baked in. ATR-1 is the default in Leo's model menu; the major OpenAI, Gemini and Claude models sit alongside it, so you can run a second reading of a hard passage into its own tab and compare.
What other tools do with the marks
General-purpose OCR (Tesseract, ABBYY FineReader, Google Cloud Vision, Amazon Textract) was built for modern type: the long s becomes f, brevigraphs are dropped or garbled, and the macron is read as an accent. A British Library study of its nineteenth-century newspapers (Tanner, Muñoz and Ros, 2009) measured about 78% word accuracy, and blamed the long s for the lower scores on the older Burney newspapers.
Trainable HTR platforms such as Transkribus, eScriptorium and OCR4all follow their ground truth: if the training transcriptions expand, the model expands. Transkribus asks users to transcribe abbreviations as they appear and add the expansion as a tag — principled, but you inherit the labelling convention, and typically train a model first.
General AI models used on their own can read clean material surprisingly well, but they tend to quietly modernise — Gemini included — and to silently expand: q̃ becomes que with no flag. That is the worst kind of error, because it is plausible and invisible, the opposite of a dropped brevigraph, which announces itself. Our note on fluent, plausible errors explains why they survive proofreading.
No system reads abbreviations perfectly; what a preservationist model buys you is that verification is possible at all. If your material is early-modern print — the long s, ligatures, and typographic abbreviation that conventional OCR mishandles — the same specialisation applies, and the free tier or a paid plan is the way in. For the hands and letterforms underneath all of this, see our guides to early modern paleography and secretary hand.
A working method
Start with the typology, not the individual marks: knowing the class tells you where the missing letters are, which is most of the battle. Memorise the high-frequency signs — the macron, the p-forms, the two 9-shapes, the long s — because they recur everywhere and repay the effort within a page or two. Keep Cappelli, the Handbook's abbreviation list and the relevant language tutorial within reach for the rest; for English material, the free English secretary hand course teaches the signs in context. And decide, before you begin, whether you are preserving or expanding, and hold to it — because the marks a scribe made to save time are, four centuries later, some of the best evidence you have about who wrote what, where, and when.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are manuscript abbreviations?
Manuscript abbreviations are the rule-governed shorthand scribes used for a thousand years to save parchment, ink, and effort. They fall into five structural classes: suspension (a word cut short at the end, like Tho: for Thomas), contraction (letters dropped from the interior, like dn̄s for dominus or Dr for doctor), brevigraph (a single sign for a letter, syllable, or word, like the raised 9-shaped -us mark), superscript (a small raised letter, as in wᶜʰ for which), and ligature (joined letters such as æ or ct). The system descends from Roman Tironian notes and, because it is conventional, it is learnable.
What does the long s (ſ) mean in old handwriting?
The long s (ſ) is a genuine s, used at the start and in the middle of words until about 1800 in English, and later in German Fraktur. It looks like an f without the tick or crossbar, which makes it the commonest misreading on early-modern material — for people and for general-purpose OCR alike.
What does a macron or line over a letter mean in manuscripts?
A macron — a horizontal stroke over a vowel, also called a titulus — signals an omitted m or n. So comūne expands to commune, English frō to from, and German genom̄en to genommen, where the Nasalstrich stands for the missing nasal. Two cautions: the bar can also be a general sign that letters are missing, and some bars are empty flourishes — if the word is complete without the mark, read it as written.
What does a p with a line through it mean?
It depends on where the stroke is. A p with a bar through the descender (ꝑ) is per or par, as in ꝑishe for parish. A p with a loop back through the descender (ꝓ) is pro, as in ꝓfitt for profit. A p with a hook or bar above it (pͤ) is pre or pri, as in pͤsent for present. Scribes often used ꝑ and ꝓ for each other, so check your reading against the word it makes.
What abbreviations are used in Middle Dutch manuscripts?
Middle Dutch scribes used the Latin system more sparingly. Common patterns: a bar over a vowel for an omitted n or m (and over the n of ende); sigla between points, such as .co. for coninc; a raised apostrophe for er or re, as in d' for daer; a struck v or w for ver or wer; a raised vowel for an omitted r; a raised t for -heit or niet; a 3-shaped sign for et, dat, wat or niet; and the 9-sign for con or a raised -us. Expand them according to the scribe's own spelling and dialect.
Should you expand or preserve abbreviations when transcribing?
It depends on what the transcription is for, and the decision must be declared and held consistently. Silent expansion is inappropriate for source-preserving work, because abbreviation practice is itself evidence of date, place and scribe. Editions that expand often print the supplied letters in italic or brackets, so a reader can see what was on the page. TEI's <choice> mechanism encodes both the abbreviated form and its expansion in one file, so nothing is lost.
Can AI or OCR transcribe manuscript abbreviations accurately?
No tool reads abbreviations perfectly, and the failure modes differ. Leo's ATR-1 is tuned for historical documents and trained to transcribe what is on the page, so it keeps the long s, the macron and the raised letter; its mistakes are usually a wrong letter you can check against the image. General-purpose OCR is built for modern type and drops brevigraphs or reads the long s as f. General AI models tend to quietly modernise and silently expand abbreviations — q̃ becomes que with no flag. Whatever the tool, verify against the image.